Canada.com: Finally, officially a Canadian

January 24, 2008


VANCOUVER — A special ceremony today that officially made Joe Taylor a Canadian attested as much to the capriciousness of Canadian citizenship as it did to its inclusiveness.

Front, left to right: Don Chapman, Meille Faille (Bloc Quebecois) Andrew Telegdi (Liberal), Joe Taylor and Frank Wong of the Chinese Canadian Veterans Association, pose for a photograph following Joe Taylor's citizenship ceremony in Vancouver, January 24, 2008.


Click here to read original article on Canada.com website

The son of a Second World War soldier and a war bride, Taylor had his citizenship stripped from him by the 1947 Citizenship Act. He was labelled a bastard in the process.

Taylor's parents weren't married when he was born -- his father's commanding officer had refused Joe Sr. permission to marry -- and at age 24, Taylor didn't reaffirm his citizenship. The Canadian government used both reasons to deny his Canadian-ness until today, when Taylor was granted citizenship on the basis of a special ministerial permit.

Don Chapman, Melynda Jarratt and Joe Taylor, Vancouver, BC, January 24, 2008.

Flanking Taylor as he took the citizenship oath were Chinese-Canadian veterans including Frank Wong. Wong, Taylor's father and 14,000 Canadian troops landed on Juno Beach on D-Day in 1945. Both Taylor's father and Wong had been born here, but Wong wasn't a citizen because of his race.

The act that gave Wong his citizenship, stripped Joe Taylor of his birthright. The veterans were there to bear witness to both being wrong.

Poet and author Roy Miki was another of Taylor's guests. Two decades ago, he led the redress movement for Japanese-Canadians interned during the Second World War.

Hereditary Chief Adam Dick, whose father had also been denied citizenship, blessed Taylor and gave him a Kwagiulth name -- Max Ke Noxw Dzi or big killer whale -- before the ceremony. The Kwagiulth believe the best hunters and providers are reincarnated as whales. The chief believes Taylor's battle to regain his citizenship has provided a way for others.

In his bid to reclaim his birthright, Taylor won a sweeping victory in the Federal Court. Judge Luc Martineau ruled sections of the act were unconstitutional, denied the right to due process and were contrary to the principles of fundamental justice.

Canada won on appeal in November, at which point the government offered Taylor a special deal -- a ministerial permit. Taylor took it rather than fighting a costly and protracted appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Ed Komarnicki, parliamentary secretary to Citizenship Minister Diane Finley, told Taylor today: "Please understand that it was not a personal matter. As a government, we have always had sympathy for your case and your genuine desire to be a Canadian."

But Liberal MP Andrew Telegdi denounced the government for its "continuous deprivation of citizenship rights" to an estimated 400,000 Canadians whose citizenship has been stripped by the 1947 act of Parliament.

"How can the government say that it is granting him [Taylor] citizenship because what happened was wrong and then continue its discriminatory practices against others like him?" he asked.

What Telegdi and others -- including Don Chapman, who has organized the so-called Lost Canadians into a formidable lobby group -- want is quick passage of Bill C-37, which was introduced in December. It would plug the gaping holes in the act. But they'd like a few amendments, including one that would make all of the war brides' children automatically Canadian rather than supplicants for ministerial permits.

Chapman, who is not yet Canadian, has become expert in citizenship law after more than 35 years of trying to regain his. One flaw he sees in Bill C-37 is that it could create another generation of Lost Canadians because children of Canadians born outside Canada who turned 28 in 2005, 2006 and 2007 won't appear to have the opportunity to assert their citizenship rights.

Another is that some children of Canadians could be rendered stateless. If a first-generation Canadian, who was born outside Canada, were to have a child in a country like Japan that doesn't automatically confer citizenship, the child would be stateless.

Finally, Chapman believes the bill allows "naturalized Canadians" -- immigrants -- more citizenship rights than than native-born Canadians.

Here's how that would work: A person becomes a Canadian citizen at age 10. At age 30, he or she goes to the United States and has a child. The child would be entitled to Canadian citizenship. A Canadian citizen, born in the United States to Canadian-born parents, comes to Canada at age 10. At 30, he or she moves outside Canada and has a child, who is not eligible for citizenship.

Even though in each example, the parent spent 20 years in Canada, the bill says citizenship ends with the second generation born outside Canada.

Yet even if Bill C-37 is amended and passed, Chapman, Telegdi and others want a completely new act because the revised act will still not comply with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That's because it will retain Section 7, which allows the government to revoke the citizenship of six million, naturalized Canadians in closed door sessions without the public having any knowledge or recourse. It's Hitler-esque.

Most Canadians take their citizenship for granted.

We need Taylor and all of these others to remind us how precious it is; so precious that first nations, Chinese- and Japanese-Canadian soldiers fought for the country even before it would even deign to call them citizens.

As Taylor said simply: "It means everything to me."

dbramham@png.canwest.com

Capital News On Line: A Canadian lost in his own country



By Katie DeRosa
Producer: Eric MacKenzie

Click here to read the original article on line at Capital News On Line.

OTTAWA | Nov. 2 , 2007 — Tears streamed down Guy Valliere's face as his daughter read from the document that brings the Canadian veteran one step closer to becoming a Canadian again.

This was how Michelle Valliere described her 81-year-old father’s reaction to the temporary residency he was granted after a year of being lost in his own country.

"Somebody, somewhere should realize that there's a lot of people like him and a lot of families like mine," she says.

Valliere is one of the so-called "Lost Canadians" who were stripped of their citizenship because of a little-known clause in the 1947 Citizenship Act.

Like Valliere, Canadians whose fathers were citizens of another country effectively lost their citizenship if they left Canada. Under this law, women and children were considered chattel of the father. The law also affected border babies, war brides and their children if they failed to register their citizenship before their 24th birthday.

The law was repealed under the 1977 Citizenship Act but it left possibly thousands of Canadians, including veterans and their children, unable to call this country their homeland.

Being rejected as a Canadian citizen was hard for Valliere and his family, says his 53-year-old daughter Michelle. But the emotional burden became a financial one on Oct. 15, when Valliere suffered a stroke that landed him in the hospital. Doctor after doctor told the two that Valliere was not covered under Canada's public health-care system because he was not a Canadian citizen.

Valliere was born in Quebec to an American father and a Quebecois mother. After a brief stint in the military in the 1940s, while he was still in his early 20s, he left Canada for the U.S. in search of a wife and a better job. With his health deteriorating, he returned last year to live with Michelle in Pointe-de-l’Ile, Quebec. But Michelle says her father, "a true Quebecois," was made to feel like a stranger in his own country.

Lost, but not alone

Don Chapman, another "Lost Canadian," has led a decade-long campaign to vindicate all those affected by the law. He met Valliere in Ottawa when Valliere told his story at the citizenship hearings held by the federal government earlier this year. When Chapman heard that Valliere was being denied medical benefits, he immediately started making phone calls and writing letters to the government, urging that something be done to avoid "the Conservative government bankrupt(ing) a Canadian war veteran."
Valliere and his mother

Valliere, seen here posing with his mother, is no longer a citizen of the country he once served.

"If Guy died tomorrow he would die a non-Canadian" in the country that he served, says Chapman.

Chapman and Francine Lalonde, the Bloc Quebecois MP in Valliere’s constituency, were able to negotiate a settlement with the government. It granted the 81-year-old a two-year temporary residency and agreed to cover his medical bills, backdated to the day he arrived in the emergency room.

Timothy Vail, a spokesperson for Citizenship and Immigration Minister Diane Finley, says he could not comment on Valliere’s status due to privacy laws.

He adds that each case is dealt with individually.

Lalonde says as soon as Michelle came to her about her father, she was determined to help.

"We saw how desperate he was," she says. "He is a sick man. For him, all his past is crumbling."

"We were almost traumatized that Immigration Canada didn’t want to do anything," she says. "I think that finally when we decided to go public it became too hot for Minister Finley."

"Our hope is that he will finally get his citizenship papers because that is what he is entitled to as a citizen," says Lalonde.

Legistlation would vindicate Lost Canadians

Temporary residency is bittersweet for Michelle, who admits she is disappointed that her father is now an immigrant in his own country.

"The paper that he received, he was like an immigrant," she says. "The real papers are coming."

"I want him to be happy. I want him to be taken care of properly," she says, her voice cracking.

Chapman admits this is the first victory in the bleak story of the "Lost Canadians," but he is convinced it’s not over.

It will be over when the government passes a proposed law that will restore citizenship to most of these lost citizens, he says.

Finley has said she will introduce her bill in parliament this fall, but Vail could not say when this might be.

Citizenship and Immigration says they know of just 450 people who have lost their citizenship.

But University of Victoria demographer Barry Edmonston, also a "Lost Canadian," puts the number a lot higher. Based on 2006 census data, he says there are 250,000 Canadians who fall under the criteria laid out in the 1947 law that could strip them of their citizenship. Many who were affected may still not know it, he says.

Opposition calls the situation a 'disgrace'

Andrew Telegdi, a Liberal MP and vice chair of the House citizenship and immigration standing committee, recently denounced the Conservative government’s throne speech because it failed to mention the severe flaw in the citizenship law.

Referring to Valliere’s ordeal, Telegdi calls it a “disgrace” that a 10th generation Quebecker has been turned into a first generation Canadian.

"What is clear is that issues of citizenship and immigration are not important to the Conservative government," he says.

"Here we are saying we should honour our veterans and on the other hand we’re denying the birth right of their kids."

Finley should have tabled the bill by now, says Telegdi, and he can’t help but worry that an election could topple the minority government, pushing the issue to the back burner.

A delay in the bill or an election would reignite a year-long nightmare for the Valliere family, Michelle says. Valliere wants to die a Canadian, just as he was born, she says.

“I think we won something very, very big...but I’m still hoping it’s not too late for my father.”

Click here to read the original article on line at Capital News On Line.

'Lost' Canadian trapped in obscure citizenship rules

Wednesday, May 30, 2007
CBC News

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/novascotia/story/2007/05/30/galbraith-lost.html

A Dartmouth woman says her mother has been left out of a federal plan to restore citizenship to the "Lost Canadians."

The federal government announced Tuesday it would bring in legislation to help people who were born in Canada or born to Canadian parents and who lost their Canadian status because of quirks in the 1947 Citizenship Act.

But it will only cover those who were born on or after Jan. 1, 1947.

That leaves out Marion Galbraith, the child of a British war bride who came to Canada as a young girl in August 1946.

"My mother's situation would not be helped," Lisa Cochrane told CBC News Wednesday.

Galbraith has lived in Nova Scotia for more than 60 years and voted in countless elections. Her father and grandfather fought for Canada during the two world wars.

She was planning a trip to England this June for a family reunion, but found out this spring that she was not a Canadian citizen and therefore not eligible for a Canadian passport.

Cochrane said her mother has been told that her citizenship was taken away in error, but it's unclear when she will receive papers stating that she is Canadian.

Earlier this year, a CBC News investigation found that the provisions of the Act could affect more than 200,000 people. However, the government says it is aware of about 450 cases of people who have lost their citizenship.

Lost Canadian: Bill S-2 Passes

May 5, 2006

OTTAWA: The House of Commons tonight voted unanimously to speed the process for restoring citizenship to so-called "Lost Canadians," children who lost Canadian citizenship between 1947 and 1977 when one or both of their parents became citizens of another country.

The new law will allow Lost Canadians who immigrate to Canada to apply for restored citizenship without waiting a year, as currently required.

The surprise vote on bill S-2 represented a stunning setback for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, which vigorously opposed the bill through several sessions of Parliament. The department said it feared that some of the former Canadians might have become criminals or terrorists since their parents gave up Canadian citizenship.

Several turbulent days of sometimes intense, behind-the-scenes lobbying and infighting preceded the vote and at one point threatened to spill onto the House floor. Instead, the House passed the bill without debate or a dissenting vote.

"It's about time we welcome these people home," said the bill's sponsor, MP John Reynolds, West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast, the Conservative citizenship and immigration critic.


"Tonight the House corrected a mistake that should have been fixed more than 25 years ago," said Liberal Andrew Telegdi, chairman of the House Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration. "I am extremely pleased with the outcome."

Reynolds and Telegdi both credited several former Canadians with pushing the issue onto the national agenda: Don Chapman, a commercial airline pilot who lives in Phoenix, Arizona, and Gibsons, BC; Charles Bosdet, a business consultant now living in Cape Breton, NS, and Magali Castro-Gyr, a former school teacher now residing in France.

Paul Martin's two classes of Canadian citizens

Cover Story Canada Free Press
Paul Martin's two classes of Canadian citizens
By Garth Pritchard
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Click here for full story

Prime Minister Paul Martin said Sunday that Abdullah Khadr, arrested by the RCMP in Toronto on a provisional warrant issued by the United States, will have all the rights of any Canadian citizen during a police investigation. He then went on to say, "The family came to Canada many, many years ago, and they obtained Canadian citizenship many years ago. They have Canadian citizenship, and we don’t have two classes of citizens."

The first Canadian Citizenship Act began in the aftermath of World War II in 1947, as Paul Martin, Sr., the current prime minister’s father, toured the somber graveyards of Dieppe, and was moved to resolve that Canada needed citizens of its own, to replace the then-status of British subjects.

The legislation was a product of its time and contained wording that would shock modern Canada in the era of the Charter of Rights. Women, for example, were essentially deemed the property of their husbands, and were classified with minors, lunatics and idiots, under a disability, and ineligible to claim nationalization in their own right except in very special circumstances.

It wasn’t until 1977 that Canada got around to removing such blatant anachronisms. But the act was not made retroactive. Sadly, thousands found themselves bound by the draconian provisions of the original act. And that’s where it sits today.

The result is over 85,000 human beings--all born in Canada--but because one of their parents left Canada and took out citizenship in another country, do not qualify for Canadian citizenship.

They call themselves the "Lost Canadians." Don Chapman, himself one, has championed the cause for years. His three children are also lost Canadians. He’s a senior pilot for United Airways. He and others fought not only in the courts of Canada--where they won--but also in the hallowed halls of Ottawa, where they also won--unanimously--in the Senate under Bill S-2. Of course they were Canadians, said the courts and the Senate.

But the Liberal government’s bureaucracy has said ‘No.’

One if the "Lost Canadians" lives in exile in Europe with her husband. Oh, she won the court case alright. But then, the government approached her with a gag order. They wanted her to never speak out on how she had got her citizenship. She refused, and she still lives in exile.

There are many others.

As Canadians approach retirement age of the baby boomer generation, some boomers, some are now finding out that they, too are Lost Canadians. Born here, they worked here all their lives. But with retirement in their beloved country, Canada, the Liberal bureaucrats are proud to tell them that they do not qualify: one of their parents had taken out citizenship in another country and they are stateless.

So much for Paul Martin’s proud statement on Sunday. In fact, in spite of what the prime minister says, there are two classes of Canadian citizens--just ask the 85,000 Lost Canadians.

As a documentary film-maker, I have been working on a one-hour documentary on the Lost Canadians, featuring Don Chapman. To get some idea of how ugly this government is, when we approached the National Film Board and the CBC with the proposal, they were back to us in one day. Both refused to tell the story.

Oh, the current events programming on CBC? They refused it, too.

The Kahdr family has had their story in front of Canada routinely--championed by none other than the CBC National news. It all started when one of the Khadrs showed up back in Canada with an incredible story of being held by the Americans in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. From the time of his release, he disappeared somewhere in Europe and only showed up in Canada months later, whining that he had been illegally detained by Americans, and that he was a Canadian citizen. CBC was all over it.

As the story progressed, the truth somehow got left behind. There was a documentary done in which the mother of the Khadr family, sitting with her two daughters, makes the statement that she wished her girls would martyr themselves like their father did in a fire fight on the Afghanistan / Pakistan border.

My thoughts at that time, watching this unfold, were "My God, ask this woman where she wants her daughters to kill themselves--Toronto? Montreal?" The question never was asked.

While in Afghanistan, I had met the father. He was honoured to tell his story about his friend, Osama bin Laden, how he and his young family had lived at Tarnack Farms. You may remember this place--it was where four Canadians were killed when an American fighter pilot dropped a bomb on them--while in Afghanistan fighting terrorism.

Months later, I was to learn that Mr. Khadr was dead. American Special Forces sought me out in Bagram to tell me about this great Canadian that CBC was championing. Their story was that American Special Forces were involved in the fire fight, and they maintained the second youngest Khadr--Omar Khadr, 19--who is being detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba — threw a hand grenade that killed an American Special Forces sergeant, U.S. medic Sgt. Christopher Speer, and took the eye of Sgt. 1st class Layne Morris.

Their anger at that time was that because of his Canadian citizenship, Karim Khadr, who was wounded in the same firefight that killed his father, would be brought back to Canada to get the best medical attention the country could provide. How right they were!

I also heard that one of the Special Forces sergeants ‘stepped out of line’ in the States and charged the young Omar Khadr with murder.

We now have the arrest of Abdullah — the charges against him are from the United States, and they read: possession of a destructive device, conspiracy to murder US nationals outside the country; conspiracy to use a destructive device against US nationals and US property outside the country.

There is one very sad fact in Canada. Traditionally people who receive their citizenship in Canada vote for the government that was in place when they became Canadians. Paul Martin was drawing on this well of votes by using the Khadrs. It’s my impression that he was telling all new Canadians that the government would stand behind them no matter what. How wrong he is. There are 85,000 Lost Canadians born in Canada, but denied citizenship by his government.

My question to the Prime Minister: Is this what your father had in mind, after his walk through the graves in Dieppe, when he drafted the first Citizenship Act in 1947? Is this how he envisioned the citizenship of Canada?

Canada Free Press columnist Garth Prtitchard, is an award-winning documentary filmmaker living in Alberta.

Click here for full story

How To Contact Don Chapman

Don ChapmanAre you a Lost Canadian? Do you know someone who is a Lost Canadian and is having trouble with his or her citizenship? We want to hear from you!

Contact Don Chapman by email at info@lostcanadian.com

Maybe you really can't go home again

Danielle Smith
Calgary Herald
February 6, 2003

Are you a Canadian citizen? Don't be so sure. An obsolete provision in Canada's old immigration act may have stripped away your nationality without you even knowing it.

That's what happened to Vancouver resident Magali Castro-Gyr, who testified before a parliamentary committee last week. When she applied for certificates of Canadian citizenship for her children in 2001, she was given the surprising news she is actually a foreigner. How could this happen?

In 1975, when Castro-Gyr was a teenager, her father took out American citizenship after living in the U.S. for 11 years. From 1947 to 1977, Canada's citizenship laws were written so when a father renounced his citizenship, it applied to his children, too.

Castro-Gyr was born in Montreal, her Canadian family history stretches back generations, she has a Canadian birth certificate, social insurance number, passport and even sponsored her Swiss husband to enter Canada. But, when she tried to pass her birthright to her own children, she was informed she's actually an outsider in her own homeland.

Had Castro-Gyr's dad become a U.S. citizen after 1977, she wouldn't have had this problem. That's when the Canadian government acknowledged its policy was flawed and switched to recognizing dual citizenship, so minor children would retain their nationality. But, the government did not apply the rule retroactively. Thus, an estimated 10,000 Canadian-born people, whose families left Canada between 1947 and 1977, are not permitted to return to their homeland. They have to go through the process of applying for landed immigrant status, with no certainty of success.

Don Chapman has been fighting a one-man campaign to be recognized as a Canadian since he was 18 years old -- more than 30 years -- and has finally won several politicians over to his side.

Chapman's family lineage stretches back to the 1700s in Nova Scotia. Yet, in 1961, when Chapman was six, his dad took out American citizenship and the rest of the family was swept along with the decision. His case is even more unusual, because his brother and sister, being adopted, had to be sworn in as U.S. citizens separately, on a different day. For this reason alone, they never lost their Canadian citizenship.

The bureaucratic maze gets even stranger. In 1997, in the case of Benner v. Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled the old immigration laws were discriminatory because they granted citizenship to minor children based on the father's nationality, but not the mother's. Problem solved, right? Wrong. Mark Benner, born in California in 1962 to a Canadian mother and an American father challenged the law after being deported. Under the old laws, he would have been granted automatic citizenship if his father were Canadian; since it was his mother, however, he was required to pass a criminal background and security check. Benner, who has a criminal record, thought this was discriminatory. The courts agreed -- but the ruling did not extend to Canadian-born children.

So now, Canada is in the strange position of automatically recognizing foreign-born children as Canadian, as long as one parent is Canadian. Yet, a Canadian-born child, with Canadian-born parents, grandparents and even great-grandparents, is not Canadian if his or her father happened to take up citizenship in another country between 1947 and 1977.

Could the red tape get any stickier?

Canada is trawling the globe seeking applicants to fill its 250,000-a-year immigration targets, yet it won't extend citizenship to people born here. And, the country has been whining about a brain drain, yet it refuses to accept the children of these workers, when they want to come back.

We have room for would-be terrorist Ahmed Ressam, yet no space for Chapman, a commercial pilot, or Castro-Gyr, a teacher.
Canadian Alliance MP John Reynolds has introduced a private member's bill to amend the Citizenship Act and correct the problem. However, Citizenship and Immigration Minister Denis Coderre has so far refused to budge -- saying he prefers to make decisions on a case-by-case basis.

That's not good enough. A parliamentary committee is travelling the country over the next two weeks to hear submissions on how to amend Canada's citizenship laws. Several "lost Canadians" will be attending the hearings to plead their cases.

All they ask is to be treated the same as other Canadian-born, but relocated children, who have been permitted dual citizenship since the laws changed in 1977. It's the right thing to do; the Canadian way.

Coderre must right citizenship injustice

Elizabeth Thompson
The Gazette
Friday, January 31, 2003

Magali Castro-Gyr must have been one shocked woman back in 2001 when she applied for certificates of Canadian citizenship for her two sons, only to find out she wasn't a citizen herself - in spite of the fact she'd been born in Montreal, lived in British Columbia and had a Canadian passport and Social Insurance Number. True, she had moved to the United States with her family when she was a teenager, but she had always maintained her Canadian ties and had eventually moved back - as did her parents.


But as Castro-Gyr told the House of Commons immigration committee this week, none of that counted. The Department of Citizenship and Immigration told her that she'd lost her citizenship in 1975 - not because of anything she'd done but because her father had renounced his citizenship to become an American. It turns out that from 1947 to 1977, fathers and husbands could renounce Canadian citizenship for their wives and children, without their consent. In fact, wives and children pretty much lost their Canadian rights automatically as soon as the man of the household renounced his.


Even for the age, this was an egregious injustice. Canadian citizenship is the precious birthright of everyone born here, and no one - not even a parent and certainly not a spouse - should have the authority to renounce it for someone else.

That principle is adequately reflected in the Citizenship Act as amended in 1977, but that doesn't help Castro-Gyr and others like her. They're still officially aliens in their native land, and Immigration and Citizenship Minister Denis Coderre's suggestion - that they rely on ministerial intervention on a case-by-case basis - isn't good enough. They should get their citizenship back on application.

That could come with a cost. A few ''lost Canadians'' might head north just to cash in on Canada's welfare benefits and free health care. But it's unlikely we'd be flooded with such freeloaders. Many of the children who went south with their parents - and there are unlikely to be more than 10,000 of them - are leading happy lives in their adopted home and have no intention of returning.

The government already has a fast-track system to restore Canadian citizenship to those who voluntary renounced it. Surely, native-born Canadians who were stripped of their citizenship without their consent or, in some cases, their knowledge are entitled to even greater consideration.
© Copyright 2003 Montreal Gazette