Three year old Kasey Neal's Canadian citizenship is not recognized because her Canadian connection comes through her grandmother. Meanwhile, her two year old cousin, Darcey Miller, has his Canadian citizenship because his connection is through his grandfather.
With International Women’s Day around the corner we weren't surprised to see the Harper government take advantage of the Speech from the Throne to make an announcement that would appeal to women.
We were surprised, however, to discover that the Conservative plan to even out the patriarchal playing field consists of striking a Parliamentary Committee to study proposed changes to our National Anthem! Apparently, Stephen Harper is so concerned about gender discrimination in Canada that he wants to replace "In all thy sons’ command" with “Thou dost in us command”.
We humbly suggest that when it comes to gender discrimination, Stephen Harper has a lot more to be concerned about than five words in our national anthem.
Right now, we know of at least 100 Canadian born men and women, their children and grandchildren whose citizenship is not recognized because of gender discrimination that is openly practiced at Canada's Department of Citizenship and Immigration (CIC). Not only is it a flagrant violation of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and a Supreme Court decision, (Benner v. Canada) but it contradicts the spirit of numerous United Nations Conventions on Human Rights to which Canada is a signatory.
This is how it works: if your connection to Canada is through a female Canadian - a grandmother or mother - your application for citizenship will be turned down. But if your Canadian connection is male - grandfather or father - welcome aboard.
No politician today would dare support gender discrimination against Canadians and expect to win an election: but here we are, in the second decade of the 21st century, and our Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Jason Kenney, defends this discriminatory practice and even endorses it by refusing to change the offending sections of the Act.
Quebec born World War Two veteran Guy Valliere died in February 2009 waiting for his citizenship application to be processed.
The victims of this gender discrimination run the gamut from young and old, male and female, Canadian born and foreign-born children of Canadians. They include 83 year-old Quebec-born World War Two veteran Guy Valliere, who died in February 2009 waiting for his citizenship to be recognized, to three year-old Casey Neal, a cute little toddler who was born in the United States and whose application was turned down at Christmas because her Canadian connection is through her grandmother.
Yet Casey's adorable little cousin, two year old Darcey Miller, who was also born in the United States, had no problem obtaining his Canadian citizenship last year because his Canadian connection is through his grandfather.
Don't believe us? We'll leave it up to Senator Norma Milne, who one year ago on March 8, 2009, International Women’s Day, raised the issue in the Senate:
Hon. Lorna Milne: Honourable senators, it is International Women's Week, in 2009, and this Conservative government is still actively discriminating against women.
Senator Manning: No.
Senator Tkachuk: No.
Senator Milne: Carry on; please do. I will tell you how. Less than a month ago, a Canadian World War II veteran — if you want to hear about Canadians who served our country — died while still disenfranchised in his own country. The only reason for his disenfranchisement is that he was born to a Canadian mother and an American father. Due to the arcane provisions of the Citizenship Act, it is much easier to obtain and regain Canadian citizenship if your relationship to Canada is through a man instead of a woman. Can the Leader of the Government in the Senate explain why this Conservative government, in 2009, still holds the view that a father's family is more important than a mother's in determining citizenship?
It has been one year since Senator Milne brought up this issue in the Red Chamber and since then nothing has changed. So we will ask the question again:
Can the Prime Minister explain why, in 2010, Canadian citizens are still being discriminated on the basis of gender by CIC?
And, on the eve of International Women’s Day, as progressive women and men gather to celebrate women’s achievements, can the many activists who know about this issue explain why they have not come to the defense of their sisters and brothers who are the victims of gender discrimination at CIC?